This site is in no way affiliated with law enforcement or the Maricopa County Sheriff's Department

In court

December 31, 1969 by Probation Journal current issue  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Review: Wasted Mark Johnson Sphere; 2008; pp 345; {pound}6.99, pbk ISBN: 978-0-75153-973-8

December 31, 1969 by Guilfoyle, M.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Review: Probation in Europe A. M. van Kalmthout and I. Durnescu (eds) Wolf Legal Publishers/CEP; 2008; pp 1300; 47.50 (CEP members: 35), pbk ISBN: 978-9-05850-450-0

December 31, 1969 by Robinson, G.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Review: Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe during World War II, J. Robert Lilly Palgrave Macmillan; 2007; pp 235; {pound}23, hbk ISBN: 978–0–23050–647–3

December 31, 1969 by Armstrong, S.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Review: Hate Crime: Impact, Causes and Responses Neil Chakraborti and Jon Garland SAGE; 2009; pp 185; {pound}20.99; pbk ISBN: 978-1-41294-568-4

December 31, 1969 by Stelman, A.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

After Sonnex: A review of risk of harm management

December 31, 1969 by Cluley, E.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Will the economic downturn lead to an increase in crime?

December 31, 1969 by Fox, C.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

A review of mental health need in prison

December 31, 1969 by Taylor, E.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Tackling Knives Action Programme: Key findings

December 31, 1969 by Taylor, E.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

Addressing sexuality and sexual orientation in supervision relationships

December 31, 1969 by Beckett, C.  
Filed under Probation

Comments Off

This article focuses on ways in which issues of sexuality and sexual orientation are negotiated within supervisory relationships. In supervision, probation officers hold organizational (or structural) power afforded by their role within the criminal justice system, and are expected to use that power to facilitate change in offenders. However, this explicit understanding of power may not reflect any of many other dynamics of power within the relationship: it is not the only understanding of power that is present in the interview. Individuals negotiate, gain and lose personal agency in many subtle ways that also reflect structural differentials like race, culture, class or ability. This paper draws on research that focused on the interplay of behaviours that creates or limits power. Specifically, the ways in which sexual orientation or gendered and sexualised behaviours change the roles of supervisor and supervisee in supervision sessions are interrogated. Supervision is used as a description of a relationship of power, applied to specified relationships between staff members as well as to supervision of offenders.

Next Page »