Consequences in San Francisco and California of not taking a breath or blood test
October 10, 2008 by Attorney Blog
Filed under DUI
You have just been arrested by the San Francisco police department for DUI. After you have been arrested, you will be asked to submit to a test to determine the alcohol content of your blood. You can choose to take a breath test using a breathalyzer, or a blood test, or both.
In California, if you refuse to take the test, there are severe consequences to your privilege to drive a motor vehicle. If you were 21 years of older at the time of arrest and you refused or failed to complete a blood or breath test, a first offense will result in a 1-year suspension. A second offense within 10 years will result in a 2-year revocation. A third or subsequent offense within 10 years will result in a 3-year revocation.
If you were under 21 years of age at the time of being detained or arrested and you refused or failed to complete a blood or breath test:, a first offense will result in a 1-year suspension. A second offense within 10 years will result in a 2-year revocation. A third or subsequent offense within 10 years will result in a 3-year revocation.
If having a drivers’ license is not of major importance to you, then not having a test result makes it more difficult for the San Francisco District Attorney’s office to prosecute your case, and prove that you were under the influence of alcohol while driving. A qualified San Francisco DUI attorney can explain both the pros and cons of taking a breath or blood test.

Comments